Re: tasklet_action() - Bad Kernel Trap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tony, 

It's similar to an Oops output, but not equal, probably it's different for 
different architecture.
So, if i'm right, you can find some explaination in the file: 
Documentation/oops-tracing.txt

and in a many other internet page (searching something  related to "oops")
In short, it tell the status just before the illegal istruction.

i could Just guess some things:
> PC: [<c00102bc>] tasklet_action+0xbe/0xd2
I think that's where the program counter is at that moment. Looking at it 
you could imagine what's the problem, or at least where it happens.

0xbe word after tasklet_action starts.

>  SR: 2010  SP: c0733ae0  a2: c2dd92c0
> d0: 00000024    d1: 00000074    d2: c01f4c60    d3: 00000009
> d4: c30f230c    d5: c30b6ca0    a0: c2dd9486    a1: c01b37e8
and theese are the other register (so, you should know how your 
architecture use stack and registers). Here you can see if there's some 
completely wrong parameters, or pointer, or whatever...

The rest seem quite intelligible.

>  Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
Aieee?? LOL !!!

Hope this helps, and i hope i didn't tell anything wrong.
Bye!
-- 
-gaspa-
-----------------------------------------------
--------- Powered by Debian GNU/Linux ---------
------ HomePage: iogaspa.altervista.org -------
-Il lunedi'dell'arrampicatore: www.lunedi.org -

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux