On 7/18/07, Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IIRC, I think there were issues with using values for HZ other than 100, 250 & 1000. Can we use any value for HZ now?
Hi
> I am working on a project where I need to add some
> functionality to kernel interrupt handlers. Due to
> this extra processing my code runs quite slowly. Is
> there any way to slow down timer inetrrupts since I
> wasnt to check the effect of that on the execution
> time of my code. I am using kernel v2.6
>
perhaps you should manually define HZ variable, decreasing it means
lowering ticks per second. Trace how the related CONFIG_ value is taken
from Kconfig and applied to kernel source (probably you need to grep).
IIRC, I think there were issues with using values for HZ other than 100, 250 & 1000. Can we use any value for HZ now?
regards,
Mulyadi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
--
The box said "Requires Windows Vista or better." So I installed LINUX
