Re: nanosleep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:11:57AM +0100, hari krishna angadi wrote:

Please wrap lines at 72 characters, that makes your message easier to
read.

>            I am porting  from 2.4 to 2.6, There is a  problem,  a
>            user space code which should be pushed to kernel
>            space(driver module). In the user program there is a
>            nanosleep() function i need to know the respective kernel
>            routine for nanosleep.

Sleeping in the kernel is usually wrong. Why are you moving code from
userspace to kernel? What advantage do you think you can have in the
kernel?


Erik

- -- 
They're all fools. Don't worry. Darwin may be slow, but he'll
eventually get them. -- Matthew Lammers in alt.sysadmin.recovery
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGjgvz/PlVHJtIto0RAiE4AJ9VQ1y4OWHftmTCGCn63SgoBIfcQwCdEZUs
mnWUCw1h1AMu2UzRy/XXwKk=
=9k6V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux