Re: Are we going to use "emergency stack" for SYSENTER?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 6/5/07, Neo Jia  wrote:
hi,

I just found the code in 2.6.17 under function enable_sep_cpu, which
is going to setup the esp1 as "tss->esp1 = sizeof(struct tss_struct) +
(unsigned long) tss;", which will be used as a privilege stack when
calling sysenter.

I noticed that there is unsigned long stack[64] at the bottom of
struct tss_struct, which works as an emergency stack. Are we just
going to use that once as the kernel stack for sysenter? If yes, will
that be a problem since the stack is only 256 bytes?

When do we actually use emregency stack?
Is it used for stack unwinding when we hit a panic or something like that?
Any help?

Thanks
- --psr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org

iD8DBQFGZjA0ky6Gd9lpXlERAsHPAJ0Ynoo5jUD3/ScoHHdVXjn7fSbL0gCbBg+o
Kerk3eOjayi1uFsMj/R0Ekk=
=WB2j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Thanks,
Neo

--
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ




--
play the game

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux