Rodrigo Rubira Branco wrote: > Ok, let's clarify somethings ;) Please don't top post. > > > First of all I really recommend this links: > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9361 > http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/ > > The real-time implementations previously commented in the list relies on > "interrupt shielding" (forcing interrupts to run on a reserved CPU) and > "CPU pinning" (forcing real-time tasks to only run on a CPU which > doesn't run any other tasks), so we can't say it's a 'real' real-time ;) > (it does not take the best advantage of multiple cpu's for example and > needs more than just one in anyway). The above description is inaccurate when talking about about Ingo Molnar's PREEMPT_RT or Real-Time patch. The -rt patchset, as it is also called, takes full advantage of SMP capabilities for both interrupts and Real-Time tasks. > > Legal notice: It's just my personal contribution. > > > P.S.: Sorry my delay to answer that ;) > > > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 15:37 +0530, Raseel Bhagat wrote: >> Hi Tzahi, >> >> On 4/5/07, Tzahi Fadida <Tzahi.ML2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> What is this i hear about PREEMT_RT from VirtualLogix: >>> http://www.wirelessiq.com/content/newsfeed/9867.html >> I think the author is trying to mention the different innovative >> solutions to the latency issue in the GPOS Linux Kernel. PREEMPT_RT , >> IIRC was a Real Time patch by Ingo Molar. >> VirtualLogix's Virtual OS is another such solution, etc. >> >> Thanks, >> Raseel >> - >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs -- kr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
