Re: CONFIG_REGPARM doubt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:02:08PM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The kernel that comes with Fedora Core 4 [ 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 ] has
> CONFIG_REGPARM enabled by default.
> 
> If I enforce my own calling convention by using
> __attribute__((regparm(0))) for all functions, would it be a problem ?
> Or should I compile my kernel module against this kernel using the gcc
> option -mregparm=3 ?
> 
> Basically, I want to stipulate that the function parameters have to be
> passed through the stack even if the kernel has been compiled with
> CONFIG_REGPARM enabled.
> 
> What would be the best way to achieve this ?

That can't work:

Caller and callee must agree on where to find the parameters.

If the caller passes them on the stack and the callee expects them in 
registers, that obviously wouldn't work.

> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Sujith.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux