Re: Re: killing NPTL threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Re: killing NPTL threads
From: Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:31:52 +0700
Cc: Ramagudi Naziir <naziirr@xxxxxxxxx>, kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <b115cb5f0704272017t1458e3e1s4c01b7f7ac7fc447@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dfb262380703241245r3f1eee93pf7e4f5a09966df8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4632480C.6010807@xxxxxxxxx> <b115cb5f0704272017t1458e3e1s4c01b7f7ac7fc447@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206)

Hi

I assume you meant "thread" here and not "process" ?

Oh, yes, sorry. I did mean "thread".

regards,

Mulyadi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ

References:
- killing NPTL threads
  - From: Ramagudi Naziir
- Re: killing NPTL threads
  - From: Mulyadi Santosa
- Re: killing NPTL threads
  - From: Rajat Jain

Prev by Date: Try to add a system call but compilation error occured
Next by Date: Re: Try to add a system call but compilation error occured
Previous by thread: Re: killing NPTL threads
Next by thread: Sector sizes in the kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Mentors] [Linux Kernel Development] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI]

Powered by Linux