-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:07:38PM +0530, Daniel Rodrick wrote:
> I've always read that although it isn't completely forbidden, but
> kernel code shouldn't use floating point arithmetic. It is not
> recommended, but surely looks possible.
>
> So just for curosity purposes (and without getting into the debate of
> "You shouldn't be doing this..."), can some one point me a working
> example / code on how to use floating point in kernel?
There is no FP use in the kernel. The only thing that comes close is
the use of MMX/SSE/multimedia-instructions-du-jour in the software raid
subsystem (MMX etc. share the register set with FP).
> Also FP arithmatic is not recommended because the code will need to
> manually save and restore FPU registers in the event of context
> switch, right?
Yes, and that's what makes it so expensive to use. You can see it when
the kernel initialises raid5: even though MMX XOR has a larger
throughput than "normal" instructions, the kernel sometimes chooses the
normal instructions because the latency is so much lower.
> But how about in atomic context? Is it safe to use FP
> arithmetic ONLY in atomic context (intr and preemption disabled)?
Even in an atomic context you still need to save the FP state. See what
happens:
userspace does something with FP
interrupt
enter atomic context
mess with FP
leave atomic context
return from interrupt
userspace finds FP in a different state than before
Erik
- --
They're all fools. Don't worry. Darwin may be slow, but he'll
eventually get them. -- Matthew Lammers in alt.sysadmin.recovery
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGLd8Q/PlVHJtIto0RAiAKAJ9vf/vRM+iLYMP9Oq9YuWslb3+kyACeNaID
QDIu/HuIiuEqbMGULc/7GfI=
=N38R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
