Re: what's the logistics behind "make headers_install"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:58:30PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   i used to think i understood how "make headers_install" created the
> set of sanitized headers, but now i'm not so sure.
> 
>   since you can run that immediately after running "make distclean",
> the sanitized headers are clearly arch-independent and don't depend on
> doing any preliminary configuration.  but after i run it, as a single
> example, i can see i have the generated header file
> "usr/include/asm/page.h".  so the obvious question is -- what caused
> that header file to be added to the sanitized headers?
> 
>   i thought that process was controlled exclusively through the
> Kbuild* files, and the only Kbuild file that refers to page.h is:
> 
> $ grep "page\.h" $(find . -name Kbuild*)
> ./include/asm-frv/Kbuild:unifdef-y += page.h
> 
> is *that* the cause?  if so, why, after i delete that line, do i
> *still* get page.h being added?  what am i misunderstanding here?

It's an error in your grep command, try it with Kbuild\* .

> rday

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux