Re: printk in interrupt handlers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi..
I was under the impression that it is ok to use printk in interrupt
handlers. I tried to use printk in some scheduling code (which, if I
am not mistaken, is called on return from the local APIC timer
interrupt handler). Unfortunately, this deadlocks my system. A one
line message appears (recursive spin lock on CPU\1, with different
processes as current when it happens). I have compiled in deplock,
locking self-tests, and almost every other self-test found in the
Accidentally, I found this commentary while observing switch_to:
/* never put a printk in __switch_to... printk() calls wake_up*() indirectly */

IMHO, that means, it can block...and interrupt handler should not block while in top half IIRC.

regards,

Mulyadi


--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux