Re: Linux ieee1394 performance query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[snip]
> far better (almost twice) than Linux, unless I am doing something
> wrong.

Quite a specialist question, not really kernelnewbies anymore. I think
you'd better ask this on the linux1394 mailing lists. See
http://www.linux1394.org/contact.php .
thanks Erik. I posted there.
No luck so hoping i ll find someone who can reply on this.

Anyway what is the average latency of the scheduler for 2.6.x kernels?

TIA
pradeep


Erik

--
They're all fools. Don't worry. Darwin may be slow, but he'll
eventually get them. -- Matthew Lammers in alt.sysadmin.recovery


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFp2lq/PlVHJtIto0RAnyyAJwOSONwJl90DI9HXri9yTUsnnyyuQCfYkvp
nZ4F1IZJgqIvC1xQh18KK70=
=hCJe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





--
play the game

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux