On 12/22/06, Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli <chbhanukalyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion but the performance was terrible when write > cache was disabled. Performance degradation is expected. But the point is - did the anomaly, that you have pointed out, go away? Because if it did, then it is the disk cache which is causing the issue, and you will have to live with it. Else you will have to look elsewhere.
oops, sorry for incomplete answer. Actually i did not tested thoroughly but my initial tests showed some bumps and serious performance degradation. But anyway there was still some bumps... :( (sequence)(channel)(write time in microseconds) 0 0 6366 0 1 9949 0 2 10125 0 3 10165 0 4 11043 0 5 10129 0 6 10089 0 7 10165 0 8 71572 0 9 9882 0 10 8105 0 11 10085 -- --------------------------------------------------------------- regards Manish Regmi --------------------------------------------------------------- UNIX without a C Compiler is like eating Spaghetti with your mouth sewn shut. It just doesn't make sense. -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/