Re: which way is faster?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 12:56 +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 17:12 -0500, Ming Zhang wrote:
> >> See this code piece
> >>
> >> http://lxr.linux.no/source/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c?v=2.6.18#L1049
> >>
> >> 1056         lba |= ((u64)scsicmd[2]) << 24;
> >> 1057         lba |= ((u64)scsicmd[3]) << 16;
> >> 1058         lba |= ((u64)scsicmd[4]) << 8;
> >> 1059         lba |= ((u64)scsicmd[5]);
> >>
> >> it can also be written as 
> >>
> >> lba = be32_to_cpu(*(u32 *)(&scsicmd[2])
> 
> ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) "6.5 Expressions" [#7]

read but still can not understand why u list this here.

i wrote code in that way because scsi specification list cmd in big
endian and that 4 byte will fit a 32bit BE well.

> 
> For example, what is the alignment of ``scsicmd'' ?

but as all of you pointed out, the alignment will be an issue.

> 
> ~velco
> 


--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux