On 9/21/06, amrut h <h.amrut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think you are interpreting in intel syntax , but this is AT & T syntax ,(correct me if am wrong)
Hope this will help http://sig9.com/articles/att-syntax
the value in eax is first made 0 and then incremented by 1.
What will be the impact of line 43 and 44 in above lines of code?
I think you are interpreting in intel syntax , but this is AT & T syntax ,(correct me if am wrong)
Hope this will help http://sig9.com/articles/att-syntax
Bye,
Krishna .
--
BLOG: http://gnubie.blogspot.com/
WEB : http://freeshell.in/~krish
