Re: is NETLINK mature ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/12/06, Jakko Pastuchio <jakkop@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/12/06, Rajat Jain <rajat.noida.india@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > I need a simple kernel<->user channel.
> >
>
> How about sysfs?

overkill. I don't want to affect filesystems. only a simple binary channel,
privately used.
I guess it is either Netlink or Connector or Ioctls.
what do you say ?

Thanks,
jakko.

I believe the iSCSI project went the netlink route over a year ago.  I
think it is working fine for them, but you might want to ask on the
linux-scsi list.

If you want to get your code into the vanilla kernel I would stay away
from ioctls.  There is a lot of resistence to them.  A lot of it is
due to the difficulty of supporting variuos CPU architectures via
ioctl.

Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux