On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:21 -0700, Aleksey Gorelov wrote: > > --- Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > it'll be easier and quicker to rev engineer 5 more formats than it will > > > > be to get the bios thing working ;) And the performance of the bios > > > probably true - I'm actually not great fan of originally proposed approach. But, > > > unfortunately, manufactures and vendors still look more to MS. Until market > > > situation changes, there is always a gap... > > > > there are only so many different ways to describe raid0. > > And those companies aren't going to keep changing that "just because", > > changing costs them money, so there is an incentive for them to keep it > > as is > > Bottom line is - today there is lack of support for it, can you name one? (so far all you did was claim this but not name even one) -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
