Re: Query regarding interrupts on a dual core machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
On 8/2/06, Usman S. Ansari <uansari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> After going through the BIOS menu, I couldn't see that it had multi
> threading support. Hence this parameter was set to 2. Anyways, even after
> setting this to 4, the result is the same. All interrupts are delivered to
> CPU0.
>
>
> Do you have irqbalance running ?
>
I have the following setting in config file
>CONFIG_IRQBALANCE=y
>Shouldn't this suffice?
No. There is user level deamon too.

 On FCs

 service irqbalance start
 chkconfig irqbalance on [for auto starting]
Thanks for the  information. After running I can now see that the
count of interrupt
increases on CPU1 as well. However, I am curious now since from the man page of
irqbalance I see

"The  purpose of irqbalance is distribute hardware interrupts across
processors on a multiprocessor system in order to increase
performance. It is useful mostly just
for 2.4 kernels, or 2.6 kernels with CONFIG_IRQBALANCE turned off."

I tried this on another dual XEON processor machine(kernel 2.6.13). On
this machine I can see from /proc/interrupts that interrupts are
distributed on both processors. But irqbalance is _not_ running on
this second machine.  The kernel config file is almost same as on my
dual core machine. I am confused now.

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux