tsc vs halt -> seq_lock per halting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




my geode tsc has a bug - it stops, or slows, when the scheduler decides to go idle. The GenericTimeSystem patches test the tsc, detect the slip, and derate the clocksource,
and booting with idle=poll makes the tsc pass that test.

It occurred to me that updating a seqlock before idling might be nearly free,
and updating another when waking might be too.
How far wrong is this silly assertion ?

In principle, knowing that the tsc is usable for some timestamp is good.
I doubt that the costs of checking the lock make it worth contemplating,
esp as there are 2 workarounds, but it sounds maybe tinker-worthy:

? how often does the scheduler go 'idle'
? how to capture the slip statistically

apologies for musing out loud
-jimc

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux