Re: measuring usb transfer throughput

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/4/06, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, use usbfs to send raw data down to a device that you know can handle
> line speeds in order to measure the kernel throughput.  Otherwise you
> are only testing the throughput of the USB device itself (which is
> almost always slower than what the kernel can provide.)

Thanks, I will look into this.

> What do you really want to test this for?  What are you expecting to do
> with the results?

I want to learn what maximum USB throughput we can get out of a
particular platform with the added effect of a combination of factors,
such as the host controller and memory access speed on this platform.
(it's a memory-mapped embedded host controller).

Thanks,
Bahadir

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux