Hi! On Friday 24 February 2006 12:20, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > > code:89 5a 04 89 13 89 43 04 89 18 5b c3 8d 76 00 81 f9 ff 3f 00 > > <0> kernel panic : Aiee,kernel interrupt handler! > > IN interrupt handler- not syncing. > > Looking at this message alone, it is likely that you are sleeping inside > interrupt context. Solution: don't use sleeping function...use non > sleeping delay function if you really need to delay something here. > Can you give an example for a non-sleeping delay function? Are such functions a solution to "schedule while atomic" errors caused by the use of schedule_timeout() in atomic operations? Regards, Andreas -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
