Re: some doubts on cache coherence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hello...

I think BH are not executed in process context, they are executed

Maybe I am not clear. What I refered by bottom half is the general mechanism of deferred procedure. So, in this sense, workqueue can be classified as bottom half. And since workqueue is executed by keventd/events kernel thread, this means it works on process context.

I hope I clear out the confusion....


when the BH work is done in a workqueue, is it typically the top half that
does the enqueing, or is it usually a BH pump-primer ?


Also (trimmed earlier)

You can see that at the end of do_IRQ() function, we call
do_softirqs(), which actaully call all the active and registered
softirqs and we still are not in process context. softirqs is also BH
like mechanism to defer some work.


Sounds like do_softirqs() is the real BH pump-primer,
and the registered softirq handlers would encqueue the work

close ?


Is there a recommended max for top-half execution time,
instruction count, no-looping, asmlinkage, etc ?


tia



--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux