Re: Compilation issue with spin_lock_bh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/13/06, Sanjay Acharya <sacharya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I tried every possible way and I finally got it compiled.
> Its kind of strange.
>       In my makefile I changed CFLAGS = I. to CFLAGS += I. and it
> worked. Basically, after the above statement I have a series of "CFLAGS
> +=" statements. I don't know how changing from = to += would compile in
> a different way. Need to do some research on this :). If someone can
> shed some light on this it would be great.
>

It will be helpfull to get to the problem if you send your makefile !
By the way I think your CFLAGS = l.  assignment will be overriding the
default flags added (might be some which were added by the kernel
makefile) and changing it to CFLAGS += l. adding another flag and also
keeping the previous flags (CMIIW)

--
Fawad Lateef

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux