Re: Doubt regarding Interrupt handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 13:12:42 +0530, Vijay Ram.C wrote:
>  I have a doubt regarding a interrupt handlers. It is mentioned in LDD that
>  when SA_INTERRUPT flag is used, all the interrupts on that  processor are
>  disabled. Does this mean that all interrupts that occurs during the fast
>  handler processing are ignored ?  Or  those interrupts   that occur during
>  that time are stored elsewhere and processed only after the current
>  interrupt handler processing is done.
> Kindly somebody please help me in understanding this.

Forgetting them would be quite fatal to the system -- so they are delayed
until enabled.

AFAIK the count is not remebered though, so if the same interrupt (the same
number) comes several times while disabled, it will only run once afterwards.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

-- 
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux