Re: preemtive or non-prempteve ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:

Background: To preempt a task in the kernel within a driver, the driver
must be able to live with that at the preemption point because the very
same driver may be called for completely different tasks in between. So
the driver writer has to make sure that - at the preemption point - his
driver continues where he left independent of the different sys-calls to
the his driver for different tasks, file-descriptors, etc.
So you actually *must* program that into your driver (and there is
basically no way around it since it depends also on the hardware/device
which your drivers is responsible for (if and) how you implement this.
This may be different in different drivers.).
Therefore busy-waiting is basically evil and not to be done without good
reason (and even then only for a very short time - as seen in kernel
speed).

Yep, I agree.

The real-time people use RTAI and don't really care about the rest of
the Linux kernel. Or do you mean the low-latency folks?

Yep, I meant the low-latency guys. Of course, for hard realtime constraints, one should go with RTAI or Adeos.

Sincerly,

Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxx

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux