Re: Linux kernel 2.6.12 module dependency issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arjan,

They have some userspace application that monitors
stuff, creates devices before module loadup and things
like that. I imagine they have still stuck to this
existing design due to their need to keep it mostly
unchanged from their 2.4 days, and also the fact that
they have a unified codebase across a whole lot of
platforms including *BSD; but I agree, it is a bit
painful to work with.

Thanks & Regards,
Rock



--- Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > This may or not may not be trivial to specify
> since
> > module "B" which comes from a vendor has a
> > non-standard way of loading; just doing "insmod
> > module-b.ko" or "modprobe module-b.ko" doesn't
> work;
> > it has to be invoked from a script which does some
> > homework prior to that.
> 
> can you say what kind of homework?
> this sounds like a bad design on your vendors
> part...
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux