Quoting Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, A.M. Fradley wrote: > > > That would go inside the page fault function. I'm going to look into > > doing it this way as part of the runqueue structure for now. I think I > > should start by moving the strusture definition into sched.h. I also > > need to check the math behind that algorithm. Am I on the right lines > > with the runqueue thing? > > Why move this into the runqueue? The runqueue contains processes > that are runnable, I don't understand how you want to hook into > that processes that are not runnable but waiting for page faults... > > -- > "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. > Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, > by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan > Perhaps in the cpu structure then? My reason for this is that I figured activating the tokening on all computers on a network when only one of them had high vm pressure would slow down all the others that didn't. So I wanted to make the fault rate available for each seperate computer and overall for a network. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
