On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:19:58AM -0700, Sanjay wrote: > Then, do I have to distribute separate binary module to each kernel > release?. Why do you think that it is legal to distribute binary modules for Linux at all? That being said, yes, you need a different binary module for every kernel release, with every different combination of kernel configuration options, and every different kernel compiler that anyone might use. Also watch out for the different kernel apis between kernel versions, they change all the time (sometimes in ways that don't make it easy to notice...) Good luck with that huge matrix of options, I've seen it drive many a person quickly insane. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Article @ http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4389927951.html Says .. "The Module versioning support option (marked as experimental in the current 2.6 kernel source) adds extra versioning information to compiled modules at build-time. This information is designed to help increase module portability to kernels other than the one that they were compiled against." Anyways this is not working for me. Do you have any idea about the same? Thanks/Sanjay -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
