Hi Pankaj & Mandeep your solution is also right one & my solution is also work fine . Now question arises which is more good one ??? can u tell me wht advantage we will get by using ur method ??? -----anil --- pankaj dekate <kernelhackers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > i think it's the other way around.... i.e the > modules is being > > compiled for a 2.4.20 (a typical modversions > prob.!)...whereas > > the one ver. of the kernel from which he's trying > to "insmod" > > is the std. RH 9 (2.4.20-8). And it's advisable > not to use kernel > > source headers, rather the path for your header > files should be > > > > /lib/modules/<kernel ver.#>/build/include/ > Yeps.This is the right solution.Even i had faced > this problem.Include > kernel headers from the above mentioned path and the > issue will be > resolved. > > Pankaj > > -- > Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux > kernel. > Archive: > http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ > FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/ > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
