On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:47, pankaj dekate wrote:
> I couldn't even get the statement
> "it says such macros are used to have a
> block of statements without errors on subsitution."
> I think Jim must be right.It could just be a hook which could be
> redefined later.Now another guess could be to check out whether
> "do{}while(0)" is another macro defined .....
I don't think this is the case. It makes no sense to define parts of the
programming language as a macro and I'm not sure if this even is allowed.
Thanks, Tobias
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
