On advocating the kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

This is somewhat OT but I feel folks here might have some useful pointers.

I was recently reminded how much confusion exists with regard to Linux
licensing (specifically the kernel here, but also other parts of the
GNU system are affected). While sitting with a group of guys in a
technology meeting, a reasonably smart nuclear physicist proudly piped
up that Linux is of course not going to be free any more in future
versions.

He'd misinterpreted the Redhat position, like so many others. Thing
is, I don't seem to have a reference to a really simple and
straightforward website or page which dispells these kinds of myths in
a clear and concise fashion, that isn't deemed politically or
otherwise motivated. While the FSF website isn't always so pragmatic,
their page on the use of Word documents was actually sufficient when
forwarded to an HR type that they could see my point about not
supporting Microsoft through electronic document distribution - we
need some useful pages which just dispell these kinds of untruths
without getting in to the politics of the situation.

Views?

Jon.

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux