-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Athul Acharya wrote: | it's not; I see no record of this vuln. elsewhere and whois records | show no affiliation between fedora-redhat.com and redhat.com. Looks
Yes, the domain was registered on 24th Oct 2004 (today).
On http://www.redhat.com/security/ ,
"Red Hat has been made aware that emails are circulating that pretend to come from the Red Hat Security Team. These emails tell users to download and run an update from a users home directory. This fake update appears to contain malicious code. Official messages from the Red Hat security team are never sent unsolicited, are always sent from the address secalert@xxxxxxxxxx, and are digitally signed by GPG. All official updates for Red Hat products are digitally signed and should not be installed unless they are correctly signed and the signature is verified."
Regards, Manish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBfEar9364pdQFFqARAtygAKCxlwFzLatieMIgGFvJ4h0cYd9PzgCfQSFC CExV230WH13fHVY/9/AMl20= =Ln8Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
