> This is what udev is for, and previously also devfs. > It has been done > in userspace properly using a daemon which handles > device creation in > a portable way - so it's not worth re-inventing the > wheel for just one > driver - but more to the point, it's icky and yucky > doing this in a > driver. Thanks again Jon. I read very nice explanation that why we sys_call_table support has been stopped. In some kernel versions it is possible to add or modify a systemcall by changing the sys_call_table. But because this table is not intended to be changed at runtime, it has no protection. Changing the table will lead to race conditions. Even without the race conditions, there are problems related to removing the modules while they are in use or stacked. Because of the problems with changing sys_call_table from modules, the symbol is no longer exported in new kernels. In other words if you get "unresolved symbol sys_call_table" when trying to load a module, it means there is a bug in the module, and the kernel does no longer accept such buggy modules. Regards Dinesh Can anything be sadder than work unfinished? Yes; work never begun." -- Christina Rossetti ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/