Re: kernel/sched.c - schedule()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, ml@skeletoid.org wrote:

> In the schedule() function, there is this line:
>
> if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
>
> I wonder why the right part is needed.
> PREEMPT_ACTIVE is defined to 0x4000000,
> so, even if preempt_count() return 0,1,2,.. it will always be 0 when we do the
> logical AND with 0x4000000. So !0 become true, therefore the right side is
> always true. Maybe am I missing something?


You are.  The preempt count is actually _set_ to PREEMPT_ACTIVE.  You
can see this in the very file you referenced.

So the check is not whether or not preempt_count() is returning any
value, but whether or not it has been and'ed (or set to) PREEMPT_ACTIVE.

This flag is used to delineate whether or not the current schedule is
occurring off of a kernel preemption.

Robert Love

So,
What should be the value of preempt_count for preemption.
Is it PREEMPT_ACTIVE or other value.
IS there any documentation on kernel preemption for us to read. I have read your interview with Kernel Trap and your article on 2.6 internals. That was really fruitful for me. IS Anythig more available?


Thanks

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



-- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux