Re: Premptive vs non-premptive kernel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 08:10:07 +0000, manish regmi wrote:
> hello,
> >Second, because kernel preemptions (preempting when the interrupt
> >handler would of returned to kernel space) can only occur when
> >preempt_count==0.  If it is nonzero, then we cannot preempt.  So we
> >check for the state "need_resched!=0 and preempt_count==0" at the end of
> >all interrupts.
> >
> >	Robert Love
> 
> But, why it is initialised to 1. Then preempion  is disabled for it. Does 
> it do preempt_enable after initialization.

Probably. You have the code ;-).

> also, is need_sched is repalced by TIF_NEED_RESCHED  flag?

The TIF_NEED_RESCHED does not replace anything. It's an assembly
variant.

> thanks
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. 
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> 
> 
> --
> Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
> Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
> FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux