Re: Maximum size for sk_buff?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Shine Mohamed <shinemohamed_j@naturesoft.net>
wrote:
> Here the problem is not the maximum 
> size of skbuff.... but the max size for
> "pre-allocate receiving sk_buff's". I think
> its better to be the MTU of the underlying
> protocol. 
> Eg:- 8139cp.c
> 
> Please correct me if I am wrong.

  Yes, you are right. Seems, I got the context wrong.
In this context the max skbuff size is that of the
MTU, but we also need to be wary of the change in mtu
(change_mtu function of the netdevice structure).

=====
Regards,
Kiran Kumar Immidi

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux