Arjan --
Thanks for your reply. Using schedule_timeout still causes the seg fault at
sched.c line 327, prio_array_t *array is null
and deferenced (array->nr_active--) . So it is more likely a bug with
2.6.0-test9 or uml, but I haven't heard from the uml
camp yet.
-Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: "sean whalen" <swhalen@denature.org>
Cc: <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:36 AM
Subject: Re: interruptible_sleep_on_timeout error?
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
