Re: what does a number of "_" mean?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 16:49:20 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 16:29, Jan Hudec wrote:
> 
> > Actualy it's the other way around. _ functions are usualy purely
> > internal. __ functions are usualy "raw" variants.
> 
> I don't know what you mean by "functions are usualy purely internal".
> 
> By calling a function "internal", I mean it is not usually invoked
> directly but by some other face.  That is, its use is internal to some
> other function.  I suppose a synonym would be "helper" or "not intended
> for direct use".  But, of course, in the kernel there are no such hard
> rules. 

So do I.

By calling a function purely internal I mean it is never (not just not
usualy) called directly. It should have been static, but for some reason
it can't.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux