Re: Crash on insmod

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:38:57PM +0200, Gilad Benjamini wrote:
> Sad to say that this IS the interesting part.
> The ksymoops data is very un-consistent. This is the only thing that is
> consistent.
Umm... Not having backtrace makes this information virtually useless.
You can reconstruct backtrace manually, by looking at call stack
addresses, and finding them in System.map.

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ilya@theIlya.com [mailto:ilya@theIlya.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 6:27 PM
> > To: Gilad Benjamini
> > Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org; linux-mips@linux-mips.org
> > Subject: Re: Crash on insmod
> > 
> > 
> > I think this is not an interesting part.
> > run the whole thing through ksymoops, and send output here.
> > For mor information see linux/Documentation/OOPS-tracing
> > 
> > 	Ilya
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Gilad Benjamini wrote:
> > > This is the interesting part from the oops message:
> > > 
> > > Using /lib/modules/2.4.20-pre6-sb20021114 ...
> > > unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 
> > 00006e76, epc == c0005100, ra == 80117e08
> > > Oops in fault.c::do_page_fault, line 224:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 

Attachment: pgp00377.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux