Re: Advantage of Tasklet as the bottom half of interrupt handler.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:27:48PM -0800, Wayne Yen wrote:
> While the bottom half (implemented via tasklet) of an interrupt
> handler is executing, can another bottom half (similarly implemented
> via tasklet) of another interrupt handler starts execute.  My
> assumption is no.  The ultimate question, then, is that what is the
> advantage of implementing tasklet to handle the bottom half over the
> old bottom half implementation?

IIRC botomhlaves are hardcoded and activated by seting bits in a 32-bit
bitfield. While tasklets are enabled by puting a pointer in a list and
thus their number is not limited.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux