Re: pte Not Present?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Pedro Nunes da Costa wrote:

> Well, the address that was in fact 0xc005000. I've made a mistake.
>
> It seems strange that the correspondent pte_t is NOT_PRESENT, since that
> address belongs to the kernel code.

The kernel uses 4 MB pages to map its memory, which on x86
means that the page directory entries map the page directly,
without the need for a page table.

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com";>october@surriel.com</a>

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux