Il gio, 2002-10-17 alle 18:32, Greg KH ha scritto: > Changing system calls has _always_ been frowned apon, and discouraged. I know. > Makeing the table not public just reinforces the fact that you should I can't understand why the symbols is not exported just for x86 architecture, while it is for x86_64 and sparc. > not be trying to do that (it's racy and not portable.) See the lkml Sure, my code is not portable, that's why I did not submit it as patch to lkml. > thread for the reasons why this was done, and why you do not want to do > this. I'll check ASAP in order to undestand why. I now also that my last post was not costructive at all, I used hungry tones because I was disappointed and I want to apologize to all kernelnewbies people for that. > You might check out the LSM hooks, they are in the 2.5 kernel and should > give you everything you need to implement your security module. If not, > let us (the lsm group) know, and we'll work to try to help you out. Thanks for that, I'll check out by now :) Bye TheSponge -- $>cd /pub $>more beer (0> //\ Perego Paolo <p_perego@modiano.com> - www.sikurezza.org/angel V_/_ 'It seems the hardest life I've never known' I'm Linux drow 2.4.19-4GB - SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386) powered.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
