On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:28:08PM +0200, Miguel wrote: > Just a comment. kmdbg is not similar to PICE and probable never will > be. It is just patchless like PICE with a different implementation. Only > one serial gdb stub is implemented by the moment so two computers are > required. The author was not trying to do a debugger, just playing with > operating systems. It is just one application of x86 IDT interception. I > dont believe there is one debugging tool for everything (The same for > operating systems).Many people do not like kernel debuggers, specially > when there are a thousand peolple looking at the same line of the code. > Combining kgdb, kdb, pice, plex86, bochs, linux trace toolkit, dprobes, > kmdbg... can be the best debugging, and what is more important, learning > experience. If you could do me the favour of giving a single-sentence short description, I'll change it regards john -- "The simpler it is, the harder it is." - Tim Van Holder -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ FAQ: http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
