Re: pre-emption locking question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:14:26AM -0400, anton wilson wrote:
> RULE #3: Lock acquire and release must be performed by same task
[...]
> If within a driver a task locked a semaphore on a write, and then a usb 
> interrupt that caused a read of the data being written unlocked the 
> semaphore, would this be wrong? Technically, two tasks are not locking and 
> unlocked but the kernel is unlocking on behalf of no task.

Anton, you probably should investigate using wait queues for your
driver; the task calling read() or write() or whatever on your driver
gets put to sleep until the "bottom half" wakes it up when it can
satisfy the "top half".

-- 
http://www.wirex.com/

Attachment: pgp00125.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux