Re: copy_to_user() / copy_from_user() (is it really stupid?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It might make more sense if the word "moronic" was replaced with
"counter-intuitive".

John

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Erickson" <coldoneknight@rogers.com>
To: <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 9:42 AM
Subject: copy_to_user() / copy_from_user() (is it really stupid?)


>
>
> Howdy,
>
> I was reading Rusty's Unreliable Guide To Hacking The Linux Kernel
> and Rusty claims that copy_from_user() and copy_to_user() have a
>
> <snip>
> moronic interface due to the fact that they return the amount of uncopied
data
> (ie. 0 still means success).
> </snip>
>
> now uhh... if they return the amout of uncopied data, and it returns 0,
> then that means 0 bytes went uncopied... Which is exactly what we want,
> since we dont want a few bytes to go uncopyed.
>
> Is this a typo? Or am I an idiot?
>
> Thanks
> -Dan Erickson-
> -ColdOneKnight@rogers.com-
>
> P.S Dont answer that last question, :)
>
> --
> Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
> Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
> FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/
>

--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux