On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 03:06:35PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:46:47PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > I know these are valid according to recent ISO C, but it doesn't change > > the fact that they are ambiguous. > > I'm perplexed by this comment. Me too. > However, I've changed the page in the interests of keeping the peace, thanks > for the report. And I changed it back because: - It's valid C - It has been a GCC extension for years. The kernel uses even uglier GCC extensions - This is not something what I made up, it's a quoted email message Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ -- Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel. Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/ IRC Channel: irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies Web Page: http://www.kernelnewbies.org/
