Re: sys_select

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 07:12:19AM -0700, Usman S. Ansari wrote:
> My kernel module is talking to user application over a socket. I want to
> timeout, if for any reason user application is not running. Using sys_select
> seemed like a good idea (until this, see below). The other idea I had was to
> use timer and send a sigterm to the thread which is sitting on a sock_recvmsg
> call. This works, but there is a race condition, get data over recvmsg, before
> I remove timer, timer pops up.
> 
> What would be a good way, any suggestions ?

The first question is why your kernel module wants to talk over a
socket _at all_. This smells like policy in the kernel, while the
kernel should only provide mechanisms. Most of the time moving the
policy to userland makes the total design much cleaner.


Erik

-- 
J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department
of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems,
Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031,  2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Phone: +31-15-2783635  Fax: +31-15-2781843  Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl
WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/
-
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
IRC Channel:   irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
Web Page:      http://www.kernelnewbies.org/


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux