Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
From: Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:12:10 +0200
In-reply-to: <Z9KeXyPhYJHsXFqg@calendula>
References: <6eec303a-752f-41e7-a903-37b3614d170b@gmx.com> <34c26829-a535-43b5-accd-884f4acd0614@app.fastmail.com> <Z9Hk8SsJwZArWo9C@calendula> <7773800a-a467-4821-8ee0-bab3bc001ab7@app.fastmail.com> <Z9IFgS-NOhJKUsFk@calendula> <cd939795-b632-4eba-9ff0-c003c4419ba0@gmx.com> <Z9KeXyPhYJHsXFqg@calendula>
Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:UgzMvg14+S0=;exqIqX2SkmLb9+Dhg2kZWp2Sc/9 6mELhi7NLE2hnB9xUT2ATndGjAcBmM1Q0BKs4dVs0Da6ick8PMk99N9GqpLFlcY/YdwiEtxTi HVTmsVepnkZW4YM2SoiqXJzdNRNj0Sp7hYbzP+oMmvLGxi9iVI8o2DZoYCQK7TU0nxCImlKMI eqiLxFeQBesqNOB/5LvMmp4pJ2qXoxu8EB8J3akvBlKtzIA6JfNxDkHv/V1/kLE6+UXy82Mv+ UmQfkGlMlhIDElIDsG0htalojRtOy+r1Ru7WFIvymH3xnteKOOQEUx0DkFJjRgyVYy/2iZHap h0DD5rGb2ojTuFfC4MnXJE3Yp9UOcvbBJfaoAR5dPsmS4/wpHqTnZMWI9QARzA5BxHuzdpgyP DAakCjQ9csXc3Y5/gzLk/XkTrF+gXc35ysSRqbxo9eiP9KwC6OsenvhFRv2sJeMpMHtHQKG7o k9nvvab4TpUsS2LyYmFSjarq+bSyRi8v8lSwbD6skorW3zWSM+LXxADxAJXzpqLIQG4aa5tvo PS6JWRxexuHh4zUF5aLW6IT84jeNGO4Ri7YXvrdbztVdgMwaMrlG98yzlc1nZU0RAB3qqRm26 YGqLwMn2F9c1p/eeA3J3cEXytlOWSSLjkx841x9SkNyJGk0s36e03UFZm0/f7TcLlCiOTAnsJ NPE6b3M7rjnKkhQqVc15q21kVZ+69YnSOAN3ioso2dUdoQa4L1Urdb3SwO7qZqGPAGV8q0P4x xWOvf33lc/uZpMi8U8MZESkqZQati1RUAtYywOk7cG/UIScuYBroErkmdd9h0VtVZzTVH4V70 vpajviQsu+Y54SpAKKN68mQqiho0QrT9jzcFLmMXz4a5RTj3+8swLTYf/L/ZEk/+eAYEAdKh/ F8YcbI18a//8MwHZh9Kcq1y2nvP41ddwkPaDrzMTNlKVlLUhmdp7rFt4tTGxknvRCQkmlcsRG kUNFHIop6gxmf3Li5hVXJCBAlFBZwpw3pm0jtocddzZ/NaSJWa3dOXyGxWbFQevFzE5DezfUO DGNDh5QoABx7S0TcPZFg/JAvOI+pvR31NhF07EYYurSVTJpNkm1GZw8OLMSlf9bScJPND47tv IugFVHpFMaRjjSSr9+/9hvUKvLNs9vwVF0c9H4KtwrUmOY2M4KYUXe0oaKHRxk8+dCSu27bmD saFOp4xwmUsvy43+kO+oHu1kTgoIPOm8Sd41vvVxPvz8vd+8oYFUTLEakl2/DCMNQTS0PMvw6 9sxeBYNURCmMvI14lgpJz7jjCKHhkME35oDJM0NNT/w58rzqnuMdDvhYuwb/5ZzDpBqYzUHhe 17pzYx20PSlBG+mN58qCOksEo35Hq0Np5UbYvueubGDDbkxKhr8j2n9C6pnK+wM8G0WksiJmb jRmnOieSEQrBL8uOMeiyx7C/hq7EkoPpvzEHs=
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/13/25 10:59, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:

reports EOPNOTSUP because interval sets do not currently support
updates from the packet path.


Thanks.  Is there a way around that using nftables or is the main
workaround that I write it to a log and then have a script parse the log
file to then call nftables with the address settings?

/Lars

References:
- Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
  - From: Lars Noodén
- Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
  - From: Kerin Millar
- Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
  - From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
- Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
  - From: Kerin Millar
- Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
  - From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
- Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
  - From: Lars Noodén
- Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
  - From: Pablo Neira Ayuso

Prev by Date: Re: netfilter expected behavior for established connections
Next by Date: Can you look at this blog article pitch I have for you?
Previous by thread: Re: Dynamically appending addresses to a named set
Next by thread: Can you look at this blog article pitch I have for you?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]