Re: Mask as part of element in set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 03:36:19PM +0700, Vlad Tsisyk wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a set of pairs of MAC address and mask:
> 
> aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

You would like to match this?

  xx:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff

or mark is reversed?

> aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:00
>
> ...
> 
> I want to apply a mask to source MAC from the packet, and then compare
> the result with the MAC from the pair. I can do it like so:
> 
> nft add table t
> nft add chain t c
> nft --debug=netlink add rule ip t c ether saddr and aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:00

because rule syntax is not correct, mask is reversed:

nft --debug=netlink add rule ip t c ether saddr and 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:00 == aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff

that is:

nft --debug=netlink add rule ip t c ether saddr and MASK == VALUE

> ip t c
>   [ meta load iiftype => reg 1 ]
>   [ cmp eq reg 1 0x00000001 ]
>   [ payload load 6b @ link header + 6 => reg 1 ]
>   [ bitwise reg 1 = (reg=1 & 0xddccbbaa 0x0000ffee ) ^ 0x00000000
> 0x00000000 ]
>   [ cmp eq reg 1 0xffffff00 0x000000ff ]
> ...
> 
> But I have to create a new rule for each pair. Is there any
> workarounds to use sets?

You can use ranges in sets.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux