Re: Bug in the wiki

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Bug in the wiki
From: Frank Myhr <fmyhr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 07:40:54 -0400
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <d8aa9eed-4e9f-7385-6908-438e71c8c2d1@fhmtech.com>
References: <CAEXMXLRwFcx4UdjFe_15Q26iuT4K=coZLvBgYfkow_8o9=iB9Q@mail.gmail.com> <600cead8-acad-0be6-bfe4-33cee996ccd9@fhmtech.com> <CAEXMXLRqUgFmME_8OKpAWRog3dqRCG+veHbJsZPKh9xOZ98D=Q@mail.gmail.com> <16130a18-e4c1-a1b7-1414-7025389efca0@fhmtech.com> <CAEXMXLSGWtT_6JrCEFhRgvG4-Ssj1jnVUs_r4JjoFzwjiip=mA@mail.gmail.com> <d8aa9eed-4e9f-7385-6908-438e71c8c2d1@fhmtech.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1

Thinking about it some more, maybe a better solution to single-ip pingflood is to accept them all as in current ruleset, but limit outgoingicmp rate per destination ip address.

References:
- Bug in the wiki
  - From: Nuno Gonçalves
- Re: Bug in the wiki
  - From: Frank Myhr
- Re: Bug in the wiki
  - From: Nuno Gonçalves
- Re: Bug in the wiki
  - From: Frank Myhr
- Re: Bug in the wiki
  - From: Nuno Gonçalves
- Re: Bug in the wiki
  - From: Frank Myhr

Prev by Date: Re: Bug in the wiki
Next by Date: Re: Bug in the wiki
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in the wiki
Next by thread: Re: Bug in the wiki
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux