Re: [nft] Regarding `tcp flags` (and a potential bug)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:27:57AM +0800, Tom Yan wrote:
[...]
> As of the current code (or even according to what you said / implied
> "should and would still be right"), `tcp flags syn` checks and checks
> only whether the syn bit is on:

It is actually the same topic that you are discussing in several
emails: You don't seem to like that the implicit operation for the
bitmask datatype is not ==.

Fair enough.

[..]
> Probably because `{ }` implies a `==`.

Again the same argument from another email: As I said { } implies a
set, which implies an exact match on the value.

For most datatypes, the implicit operation implies '==', except for
the bitmask datatype.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux